Blackfeet vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Blackfeet
Pima
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Blackfeet Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,486,055 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.701. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 92.2 Pima.
Blackfeet vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $30,644, a difference of 23.0%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $73,365, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $51,503, a difference of 6.0%).
Income Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,695 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,717 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,509 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,822 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,402 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,864 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,603 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,531 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,595 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,029 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 85.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 74.2%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 63.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.1%).
Poverty Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.5% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 120.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 97.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 72.8% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 54.6%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 35.8%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.4% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (31.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 35.6%), associate's degree (40.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.3% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.1% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.1% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.6% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.5% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Blackfeet vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Blackfeet | Pima |
Disability | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.8% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |