Sudanese vs Pima Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sudanese
Pima
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sudanese
Pima
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pima Integration in Sudanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,478,216 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Sudanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sudanese corresponds to a decrease of 37.1 Pima.
Sudanese vs Pima Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,695 compared to $30,644, a difference of 36.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,718 compared to $73,365, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($96,783 compared to $77,431, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,401 compared to $82,821, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,982 compared to $51,503, a difference of 9.6%).
Income Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,695 | Tragic $30,644 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,783 | Tragic $77,431 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,529 | Tragic $63,262 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,419 | Tragic $38,285 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,216 | Tragic $42,357 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,215 | Tragic $35,326 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,982 | Poor $51,503 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,401 | Tragic $82,821 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,718 | Tragic $73,365 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,281 | Tragic $50,539 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Exceptional 21.1% |
Sudanese vs Pima Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 102.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 102.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.5%).
Poverty Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 21.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 28.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 27.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 29.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 29.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 28.2% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 23.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Sudanese vs Pima Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 184.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 154.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Sudanese vs Pima Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 13.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.0% | Tragic 57.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.8% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.9% | Tragic 34.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.4% | Tragic 69.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.0% | Tragic 72.8% |
Sudanese vs Pima Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (32.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and currently married (43.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.99%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (60.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
Family Households | Tragic 60.0% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 35.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.75 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 35.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.4% | Tragic 51.5% |
Sudanese vs Pima Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 23.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 86.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.6% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Sudanese vs Pima Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 67.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 65.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 91.2% |
11th Grade | Average 92.5% | Tragic 88.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 81.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.2% | Tragic 51.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 45.6% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Tragic 23.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Sudanese vs Pima Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sudanese and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 63.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Sudanese | Pima |
Disability | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Good 12.0% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 55.8% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |