Sioux vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,902,524 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,750 compared to $73,365, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $51,503, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $35,326, a difference of 0.75%), median earnings ($39,448 compared to $38,285, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $50,539, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (23.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 42.5%), and married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (13.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 25.6%), single father households (3.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.3%), bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 71.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.2%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.99%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%).