Scottish vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,423,278 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 38.9 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,440 compared to $30,644, a difference of 45.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $73,365, a difference of 39.2%), and wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $51,503, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $35,326, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $82,821, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 167.3%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 131.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 127.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.2%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 163.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 131.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 101.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 81.9%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 62.2%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.21%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 108.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 64.0%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 64.0%), and associate's degree (46.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 63.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.060%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.60%).