Navajo vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,899,599 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $47,041, a difference of 62.0%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $94,990, a difference of 60.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,759 compared to $111,051, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.9%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $42,133, a difference of 27.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $54,369, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 151.6%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 132.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 114.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 49.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 57.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 106.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 104.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 80.9%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 51.8%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.91%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.29%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.5%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 80.5%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 77.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 60.2%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%).