Czechoslovakian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,432,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 44.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,965 compared to $94,990, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $104,993, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $111,051, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $59,351, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.1%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.99%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.0%).