Ecuadorian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Laotians
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,133,464 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Laotians.
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $66,306, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $112,859, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $111,051, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.85%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,133, a difference of 7.7%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $50,343, a difference of 11.3%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.58%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Good 82.9% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 151.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.1%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.3%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.28%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Laotian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |