Immigrants from Belgium vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,162,673 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.812% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 2,811.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,082 compared to $47,041, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $59,351, a difference of 11.4%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.85%), householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $66,306, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($100,306 compared to $94,990, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.26%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.96%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.5%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.56%).