Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Laotians
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,196,103 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Laotians.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $66,306, a difference of 48.2%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $112,859, a difference of 44.2%), and median household income ($68,461 compared to $94,990, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $42,133, a difference of 26.6%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Poor 26.4% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 108.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 69.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.92%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 45.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.14%), family households (68.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.30%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 96.1%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 56.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Laotian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.4% |