Immigrants from Fiji vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,622,863 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 46.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.7%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $59,351, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $104,993, a difference of 1.0%), median household income ($93,933 compared to $94,990, a difference of 1.1%), and median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $42,133, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.71%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (26.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.7%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.30%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.6%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%).