Cuban vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,000,923 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $66,306, a difference of 34.9%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $112,859, a difference of 32.8%), and median household income ($73,392 compared to $94,990, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $42,133, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 82.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 38.4%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.24%), family households (67.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.54%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.6%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.7%).