Menominee vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Menominee
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Menominee
Laotians
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Menominee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,401,406 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to a decrease of 59.3 Laotians.
Menominee vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,903 compared to $111,051, a difference of 44.4%), median family income ($79,563 compared to $112,859, a difference of 41.8%), and median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $59,351, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,907 compared to $54,369, a difference of 13.5%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $42,133, a difference of 24.3%).
Income Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,578 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $79,563 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,423 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $37,884 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,581 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,894 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,907 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,358 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $76,903 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,719 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Menominee vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 72.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 72.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (23.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.0%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.3%).
Poverty Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Menominee vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 120.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 73.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.3% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 10.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Menominee vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.3% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.2% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.7% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Good 82.9% |
Menominee vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.0%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 79.6%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Menominee vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.4%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Menominee vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 69.1%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.0% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Menominee vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 87.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 57.2%), and male disability (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (52.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Disability Metric | Menominee | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.3% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.4% |