Creek vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,240,781 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.983. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 114.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $111,051, a difference of 40.6%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $94,990, a difference of 40.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $104,993, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,369, a difference of 19.8%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $42,133, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 64.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.15%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 32.0%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 69.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 67.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.5%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%).