Pima vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Laotians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,108,647 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 7.7 Laotians.
Pima vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,041, a difference of 53.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,051, a difference of 51.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $94,990, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,133, a difference of 19.3%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 24.9%).
Income Metric | Pima | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Poor 26.4% |
Pima vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 142.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 126.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 107.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 47.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Pima vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 157.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 138.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 126.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Pima vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Good 82.9% |
Pima vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 87.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 80.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Pima vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Pima vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 84.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 80.9%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Pima vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 72.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.5%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.4% |