Greek vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,426,090 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Greek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Greeks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Greeks corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.1%), per capita income ($49,309 compared to $47,041, a difference of 4.8%), and median male earnings ($61,242 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($94,735 compared to $94,990, a difference of 0.27%), median female earnings ($42,336 compared to $42,133, a difference of 0.48%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,715 compared to $54,369, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 13.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.78%), single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 0.070%), bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and college, 1 year or more (62.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Greek and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.4%).