Houma vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Laotians
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,602,459 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Laotians.
Houma vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $111,051, a difference of 54.0%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $94,990, a difference of 51.8%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $112,859, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $59,351, a difference of 17.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,369, a difference of 22.6%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $50,343, a difference of 29.2%).
Income Metric | Houma | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Houma vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 97.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 83.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 36.1%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Houma vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 71.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 57.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Houma vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Good 82.9% |
Houma vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 63.5%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Houma vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Houma vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 140.8%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 136.6%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 115.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Houma vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 84.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 77.1%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.0%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Excellent 2.4% |