Russian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Russian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Russians
Laotians
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Russian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,401,127 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 156.8 Laotians.
Russian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $47,041, a difference of 13.0%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $59,351, a difference of 7.7%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $112,859, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.040%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $66,306, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($98,008 compared to $94,990, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Russian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,154 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,487 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,008 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,334 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,939 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,169 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,389 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,398 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,328 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,626 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Poor 26.4% |
Russian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.21%), single female poverty (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Poverty Metric | Russian | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.74%).
Unemployment Metric | Russian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Russian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.96%).
Labor Participation Metric | Russian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.8% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Good 82.9% |
Russian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.44%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Russian | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Russian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Russian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.8% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Russian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.2%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Russian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.5% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.2% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.3% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Russian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Russian | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |