Osage vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,692,358 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.147% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 147.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,240 compared to $94,990, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $111,051, a difference of 25.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $104,993, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $42,133, a difference of 16.9%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $59,351, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.0%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.34%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.20%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.3%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%).