Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Laotians
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,684,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.886. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.160% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 160.0 Laotians.
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $104,993, a difference of 45.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $111,051, a difference of 42.6%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $94,990, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.6%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $42,133, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $54,369, a difference of 25.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Poor 26.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 57.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.2%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (59.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 12.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |