Immigrants from Latin America vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,851,847 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $112,859, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $104,993, a difference of 27.8%), and per capita income ($36,823 compared to $47,041, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.8%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $42,133, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 57.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 52.8%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.7%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.0%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%).