Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,600,924 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $104,993, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $111,051, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $42,133, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($46,969 compared to $50,343, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 23.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 12.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.050%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%).