Slavic vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slavic
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slavs
Laotians
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Slavic Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,971,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.360% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 360.2 Laotians.
Slavic vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,398 compared to $94,990, a difference of 9.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $104,993, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $111,051, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.0%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $47,041, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $59,351, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,049 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Good $105,144 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,398 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,470 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,390 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,613 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,563 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,377 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,629 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,709 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Poor 26.4% |
Slavic vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.3%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Poverty Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Average 21.1% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Slavic vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
Unemployment Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Slavic vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Good 82.9% |
Slavic vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.0%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.70%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Slavic vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Slavic vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.1% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.7% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.9% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Slavic vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Slavic | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Excellent 2.4% |