Immigrants from Russia vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,331,895 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 84.3 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.6%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $59,351, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $50,343, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.020%), median household income ($96,378 compared to $94,990, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $111,051, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.0%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.52%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.50%).