Immigrants from Guatemala vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,035,118 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.411. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 7.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $112,859, a difference of 29.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $104,993, a difference of 29.1%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $59,351, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $42,133, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 52.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 51.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.5%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.1%), no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.6%).