Lumbee vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lumbee
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lumbee
Laotians
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Lumbee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,742,491 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 15.0 Laotians.
Lumbee vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $104,993, a difference of 74.1%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $94,990, a difference of 73.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $111,051, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.7%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $42,133, a difference of 29.6%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $50,343, a difference of 36.5%).
Income Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,845 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $68,679 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $54,644 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,876 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,715 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $32,500 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $34,584 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $60,305 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $65,113 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $40,550 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Poor 26.4% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 129.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 126.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 122.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 60.4%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 60.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 61.4%).
Poverty Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 28.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 18.1% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 111.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 73.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 9.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.6% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 65.5% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.3% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.0% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.6% | Good 82.9% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 69.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.9%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.9% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 113.0%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 111.8%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.0% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.2% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.9% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Lumbee vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 74.5%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.5%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Lumbee | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Excellent 2.4% |