Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,750,473 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 83.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $104,993, a difference of 7.3%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $94,990, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $111,051, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,394 compared to $47,041, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $42,133, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $50,343, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.56%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.42%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.5%).