Arapaho vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,455,973 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.976% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 3,976.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $104,993, a difference of 46.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $111,051, a difference of 46.2%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $47,041, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $66,306, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,369, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 191.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 145.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 65.5%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.26, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.7%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 97.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.19%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%).