Immigrants from Chile vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,337,904 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.856. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.849% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 848.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $104,993, a difference of 8.1%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $94,990, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $111,051, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,213 compared to $47,041, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.91%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.68%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.6%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.6%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.10%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.60%).