Nicaraguan vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,736,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($92,231 compared to $112,859, a difference of 22.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $66,306, a difference of 21.7%), and median male earnings ($49,215 compared to $59,351, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $42,133, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 62.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.39%), family households (67.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.70%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.8%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%).