Marshallese vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,840,514 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 188.6 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $104,993, a difference of 25.6%), median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $59,351, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,455 compared to $111,051, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $66,306, a difference of 0.66%), householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.3%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 22.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.38 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.4%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.70%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 58.1%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 47.1%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%).