Blackfeet vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,568,960 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.975. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.069% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 1,069.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,509 compared to $94,990, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $104,993, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $111,051, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $54,369, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $42,133, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.2%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 33.2%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.52%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 53.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%).