Brazilian vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Laotians

Good
Good
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,111,324 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.313. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Laotians.
Brazilian Integration in Laotian Communities

Brazilian vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $66,306, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $104,993, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $94,990, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.060%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $47,041, a difference of 0.73%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Income
Income MetricBrazilianLaotian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Poor
26.4%

Brazilian vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.90%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianLaotian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Brazilian vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianLaotian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%

Brazilian vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Good
82.9%

Brazilian vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (46.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.4%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianLaotian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
28.5%

Brazilian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.6%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Brazilian vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Brazilian vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.94%).
Brazilian vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianLaotian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%