Immigrants from Central America vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,174,701 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $47,041, a difference of 34.5%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $112,859, a difference of 32.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $104,993, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $42,133, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 57.7%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 50.5%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.0%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.8%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.26, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 94.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 82.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 70.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.13%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%).