French Canadian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,080,551 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,810 compared to $94,990, a difference of 14.7%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $66,306, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $111,051, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $59,351, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 23.2%), single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.24%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.8%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (63.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.1%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.2%).