Turkish vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,319,554 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.928. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.503% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 502.5 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $47,041, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $59,351, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $112,859, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $54,369, a difference of 0.19%), householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $66,306, a difference of 2.6%), and median household income ($99,389 compared to $94,990, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.2%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (47.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.3%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%).