Choctaw vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
Laotians
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,672,473 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Laotians.
Choctaw vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $94,990, a difference of 35.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $111,051, a difference of 35.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $104,993, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,369, a difference of 19.6%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $59,351, a difference of 24.3%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Poor 26.4% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 26.1%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Good 82.9% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.5%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.6%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Choctaw vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 62.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.6%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Excellent 2.4% |