Fijian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,675,925 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $104,993, a difference of 31.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $111,051, a difference of 30.4%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $59,351, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $54,369, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $66,306, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.2%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.57%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.7%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.57%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 104.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 79.2%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 30.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.8%).