Hawaiian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,254,870 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 21.3 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $47,041, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $59,351, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $104,993, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $66,306, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.79%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 22.0%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.7%).