Native/Alaskan vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,386,729 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $47,041, a difference of 41.3%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $94,990, a difference of 39.9%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $112,859, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $54,369, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $42,133, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 76.0%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 73.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 32.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 58.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 51.0%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.27%), family households (66.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%).