Australian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,722,600 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.319% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 319.2 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $59,351, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $66,306, a difference of 0.88%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,369, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($96,490 compared to $94,990, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.87%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.4%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.1%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.6%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.9%).