Guatemalan vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Laotians
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,788,373 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.283. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Laotians.
Guatemalan vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $112,859, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $104,993, a difference of 27.5%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $59,351, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $42,133, a difference of 18.0%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Poor 26.4% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 49.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 47.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.6%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.1%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Good 82.9% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.40 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.4%), no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Guatemalan vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Laotian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |