Yuman vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yuman
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yuman
Laotians
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Yuman Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,082,397 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Yuman communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.301% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yuman corresponds to an increase of 301.2 Laotians.
Yuman vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,055 compared to $112,859, a difference of 44.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,956 compared to $104,993, a difference of 43.9%), and per capita income ($33,236 compared to $47,041, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,933 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($35,377 compared to $42,133, a difference of 19.1%).
Income Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,236 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,055 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,743 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,523 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,446 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,377 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,933 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,956 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,139 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,110 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Poor 26.4% |
Yuman vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (30.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 114.0%), married-couple family poverty (9.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and family poverty (16.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 25.1%).
Poverty Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 28.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.1% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yuman vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 269.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (14.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 124.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (37.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 9.6% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 37.4% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.0% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 16.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 9.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Yuman vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.8% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 71.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.7% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 76.3% | Good 82.9% |
Yuman vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.3%), births to unmarried women (44.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (69.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.26, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.47 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 44.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Yuman vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.5% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Yuman vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 84.3%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 71.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.2% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.1% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Yuman vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (10.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 69.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 56.3%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%).
Disability Metric | Yuman | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 31.5% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.4% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |