Ghanaian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ghanaians
Laotians
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Ghanaian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,005,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Laotians.
Ghanaian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $104,993, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $111,051, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $42,133, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $50,343, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,164 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,877 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,582 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,440 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,810 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,429 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,594 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,137 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,277 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,043 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.3% | Poor 26.4% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.6%).
Poverty Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Good 82.9% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 81.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 31.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.8%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ghanaian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Ghanaian | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Excellent 2.4% |