Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,780,985 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,267 compared to $112,859, a difference of 27.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $66,306, a difference of 27.3%), and median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $59,351, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $42,133, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 73.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.5%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 33.4%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (67.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 69.8%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.2%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.40%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.76%).