Arab vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,995,376 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $104,993, a difference of 7.9%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $94,990, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $66,306, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.84%), per capita income ($45,662 compared to $47,041, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $42,133, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%).