Immigrants from Caribbean vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,014,606 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $66,306, a difference of 36.6%), median family income ($83,319 compared to $112,859, a difference of 35.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $111,051, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $54,369, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $42,133, a difference of 15.7%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $50,343, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 96.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 55.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.7%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.69%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 116.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 13.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 80.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.5%).