New Zealander vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Laotians
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,930,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 148.3 Laotians.
New Zealander vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $47,041, a difference of 7.5%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $59,351, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $104,993, a difference of 0.090%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $94,990, a difference of 0.16%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $111,051, a difference of 0.21%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Poor 26.4% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 13.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.17%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.80%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.74%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Good 82.9% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.8%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.0%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
New Zealander vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |