Immigrants vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants
Laotians
3,042
SOCIAL INDEX
28.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
235th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Immigrants Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,750,182 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to an increase of 1.4 Laotians.
Immigrants vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,962 compared to $112,859, a difference of 11.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $104,993, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $66,306, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $42,133, a difference of 7.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,010 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,962 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,818 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,478 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,168 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,328 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,201 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,423 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,943 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,656 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Poor 26.4% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 30.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.46%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.2% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.5%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.33 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.8% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.5% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.0% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants | Laotian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Excellent 2.4% |