Ethiopian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,376,497 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $104,993, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $111,051, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,569 compared to $47,041, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,369, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($49,572 compared to $50,343, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.88%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.9% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.12%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.4%).