Ugandan vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Laotians
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,026,679 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 141.7 Laotians.
Ugandan vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $104,993, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $94,990, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $42,133, a difference of 3.0%), per capita income ($45,047 compared to $47,041, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($47,854 compared to $50,343, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Poor 26.4% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Good 82.9% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.0%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Ugandan vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.77%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |